“Toto” Supreme Court disqualifies “Chor-Pannikar” bullies, points out that he didn’t write the tiger to make the cows afraid. Every politician has the right to be punished retroactively, explaining that “Piyabutr” made a statement late because he was in a parliamentary meeting. Don’t look at it as a personal matter. But it is a problem of law.
Mr. Piyarat Jongthep, MP for Bangkok, spoke about the case of the Supreme Court ruling that Ms. Pannika Wanich would withdraw her right to apply for election forever. and has no right to hold political office for life It was stated that today’s press conference was not specific to Ms. Pannika’s issue. But talking about the problems of the constitution As a person who debates the government’s policy regarding the justice process Including the problem of the country’s structure using the law of war to manage politicians.
along with the question of whether this constitution, which is called the “Counter Corruption Version,” is to combat corruption or who? Because it was found that there were hidden problems in this constitution. It gives power to independent organizations. Issue ethical standards for each organization. As a result, MPs, Senators, and Ministers are subject to these ethical standards. And when MPs, Senators, and Ministers have any disputes, it is up to you. Instead, they did not graduate within the organization they belonged to. Instead, it gives power to independent organizations. According to the Constitution, Section 235, paragraph 3, paragraph 4, which allows the Constitutional Court and independent organizations to decide on crimes. It is considered a double punishment.
Mr. Piyarat also stated that the problem is the use of ethical standards by independent organizations to use against politicians. Therefore, one must ask the independent organization whether the former monk has ever committed any ethical violations before assuming the position. Miss Pannika’s fault It was an offense that occurred before holding political office. Therefore, it is believed that this is not a constitution to combat corruption. But it gives the Constitution an opportunity to bully politicians. Defeat politicians who refuse to surrender. and politicians who refuse to stay With this law
Mr. Anusorn Kaewwichian, MP for Kaoklai, Nonthaburi, stated that Ms. Pannikarn has been a fellow ideologue since the founding of the Future Forward Party. Before questioning the ethical standards of MPs. Do I have to go back to before becoming an MP? Can past behavior be used while being an MP? Including actions that have already taken place. Are those mistakes still there? Ready to leave a message to independent organizations whether the standards that have been set are correct or not.
In addition, will people who are politically active who are punished under Section 112 be subject to ethics investigations that overlap with criminal law? And is it fair? If in the future this law returns to you Ms. Sasinan Thammanitinan The Bangkok MP from the Kao Klai Party said that in terms of the law There should be no law to punish retrospectively. Events that occurred in the disqualification of political rights If compared to a crime, it is considered a death sentence. It is considered a high penalty if compared with the circumstances.
When asked about Mr. Piyabutr Saengkanokkul, leader of the Progress Party Came out to express his opinion that the Kao Klai Party had shown delay and was lacking in kindness. Mr. Piyarat said that Such comments are considered a contribution to the party. On behalf of the Move Forward Party, a press conference has already been issued via its Facebook page. But in today’s press conference, he did not make a statement on behalf of the party. I don’t want it to be viewed as a personal matter. The Forward Party discussed internally. Unable to act in a timely manner Because yesterday (20 Sep.) there was also a council meeting.
When further asked whether he had talked with Ms. Pannikar or not, Mr. Piyarat said that he personally had not talked with Ms. Pannikar. But I think the party should talk normally. As for the guidelines for amending the constitution If you don’t want the court to consider ethics issues Mr. Piyarat stated that As Mr. Prit Watcharasindhu presented the drafting of a new state constitution. Now it is in the process of expanding. This is one of the factors that we propose to create a new constitution that is truly democratic and free of political tools.
ethics law should be under the council Or is it a secondary law or not? There are other laws that enforce discipline. Each organization has a mechanism. This may be a discussion within the organization. The court should not point out right and wrong in ethical matters. Because ethics is not the same thing as legal. If you think that the decision is unfair, you should go to the Administrative Court.
As for whether or not it was written about tigers to make cows afraid or not? Mr. Piyarat sees that it is not about writing tigers to frighten cows. Because it is not only aimed at the Progressive Party or the Section 112 case, but the important question is General cases in which the court has already sentenced Will the Supreme Court be able to come back and punish that politician later?
followGood contentYou can find this at
Facebook : https://www.facebook.com/innnews.co.th
Twitter : https://twitter.com/innnews
Youtube : https://www.youtube.com/c/INNNEWS_INN
TikTok : https://www.tiktok.com/@inn_news
LINE Official Account : @innnews
