| Author | Sommai Paritchat |
|---|
Politics takes advantage of … which party or will you fight with the Senate Party?
Hey, the campaign season, the Dream Sale Festival has begun after Gen. Prayut Chan-o-cha, the Prime Minister, revealed his opinion that the general election date should coincide with the date set by the Election Commission on May 7, 2023.
Campaign billboards spread almost everywhere in Bangkok and other provinces. Competition to propose a policy to sell dreams to prevent bombs
The political collar next to the palace said that having dreams to sell is better than not knowing them. As for whether the dream will come true or not is another matter.
People in the world are not beautiful, so remind them that Let’s look at politics as it is. Not the way we want it to be
As for the political experts who choose sides, they compete to offer ideas for decision-making on the ballot day. Strategic elections are required. There is no need to choose the party we admire, the person we like, choose whatever you want. Gen. Prayut continued
while another sian Strategic elections are the same but opposite. choose whatever Ask Prayuth to return home. End of 3 years. Conquered. 8 years is too long.
Strategic elections lead to ideological elections. democracy-dictatorship With political elections, left-to-left becomes just a discourse. Because it’s hard to come true no matter the political policy economy and so on.
because the election is still under the political structure according to the provisions of the 2017 Constitution, Section 272, the special powers of the senators
When exploitative politics still exists, one should not expect an election that focuses on political competition as the basis for decision-making.
example of political policy Drafting a new constitution, turning off the switch, senators, etc. Who dares to offer a waste of their bodies?
If asked if all political parties agree or not, the answer will come out that most of them agree. who disagreed as a minority party
But after asking further if he agrees, will it be proposed as a policy or not? It turned out that most parties did not propose. The nominating party is a minority party.
The reason for this is because the rules that encourage political exploitation give senators the power to jointly elect the prime minister at the parliamentary meeting. It’s been eight years and it’s still doing great things.
If according to the international normal democratic rules Election results: 500 members of the House of Representatives, 400 constituencies, 100 party lists. The party with the highest number of votes gathered more than half of the votes, ie 251 votes, should have the right to form a government first.
Only when unsuccessful would allow the second-ranked party to gather more than half of the votes. If it can be done, it’s the government. occupy the position of Prime Minister
But when the rules are not as they should be The selection of the Prime Minister requires more than half of the votes of both MPs and senators of the National Assembly, which is 375 out of 750 votes.
Political parties hoping to win the Prime Minister’s office must rely on the voice of All senators came to support
For this reason, which party would dare to propose a policy to destroy their own opportunities? Draft a new constitution, switch off senators except for parties that do not rely on senators.
pleading for Senators respect the intentions of the people who vote, so it’s just a dream. There’s no way this could be true.
The conclusions from the resolution proposed that the government conduct a referendum on the new constitution by the Constituent Assembly (S.P.R.) that the minority in the Senate was defeated. It’s a clear confirmation.
Gen. Prayuth himself said that he decided to join the political party because he wanted to continue working towards achieving goals for the majority. Even if it’s only 2 years left
People who do not eat chaff can read that because he knew in his heart that the rules were still conducive to gaining an advantage over others There are channels and opportunities to return to the position again.
Political parties established to support MPs for various parties They moved to join because they saw the same opportunities and channels to power.
Is this the honorable MP in the form of a democrat under unfair rules? Let’s get the government first. Other matters for later
when stepping into power by exploiting while How can a senator who is part of politics continue to be proud?
The post-election political scene that will be interesting to see whether it will happen or not is whether any senator dares to raise his hand to choose a candidate for the prime minister from another party. In addition to merging Thailand to create a nation with the power of Pracharat
Election under the same power structure even if political parties win seats No matter how many MPs, the role, bargaining power, decisiveness is still overflowing with the senator party as before.
