Criminal Court imprisonment for ‘Ice Steel Case’ for life, killing, brutal, stuffed 2 co-plaintiffs with nearly 3 million
On January 29 at the Thonburi Criminal Court The court reads the verdict through the VDO Conference system to the black case prison number at Or. 585/2020 between the prosecutors The Attorney General’s Office, Miss Suksanaporn Chaiyachet, together with two of them, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit against Mr. Apichai or Ek or Ice Ongwisit for the defendant.
In this case, the plaintiff sued When between 4-6 August 2019 At night before continuous noon The defendant retained Miss Warinthon or Kookikik Chaiyachet, the deceased in the defendant’s room. Then the defendant kills the victim by torture or by cruelty. Following the death of the deceased, the defendant and his associates dig graves and bury the deceased in order to hide the death or cause of death and to damage, move, depreciate, or render the body useless. Without reasonable cause The incident occurred in Bang Khae Subdistrict, Bang Khae District, Bangkok. Requesting punishment under the Criminal Code Section 199,289,310,366 / 3 forfeiting of the central request to increase the penalties under the law And asked to count the penalty for the defendant in the criminal case number red Sor. 201/2563, Tue. 1140/2563 Ee. 1831/2563 of this court
The defendant pleaded guilty to the charge of co-burying, hiding, moving, or destroying the body. To conceal death and joint charges of damage, removal, depreciation or useless the corpse. The other charges denied. But admitted to injuring the body of the dead, causing death by causing anger And accept that it is the same person as the defendant in the case that the plaintiff asked to increase the punishment and the penalty count.
Pending The mother and child of the deceased submitted a request to join the plaintiff. The court allows only the offenses under the Criminal Code Section 289,310,366 / 3. And the two plaintiffs filed a petition to enforce the defendant to use compensation.
The defendant testified in the civil case that the compensation claimed by both plaintiffs was too high. It is an uncertain future compensation. And the deceased contributes to the cause The defendant is not liable for such compensation. Request to raise a request
Court of Attorney The two co-plaintiffs and the defendant then saw that the offense was jointly stealthily, buried, hidden, moved, or destroyed. To conceal death and joint charges of damage, removal, depreciation or useless the corpse. The law does not set a minimum punishment rate for imprisonment for 5 years or more or more severe punishment. When the defendant confessed The court sentenced the defendant without examination. According to the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 176, first paragraph, the facts can hear that the defendant committed the offense of both the said base.
As for the offense of killing others by torture or by cruelty And the base to detain others causing death, that even though the plaintiff did not have a testimony to witness the incident while the defendant attacked the dead and put the deceased in a solid iron box until death. But there are witnesses who witnessed and confirmed the circumstances before the defendant attacked the deceased. By hitting the head and body with a piece of iron Both handcuffed wrists and ankles and forced the deceased to sleep in a solid metal box. And the circumstances after the death of the dead Which is mixed with the way to attest to the defendant who admitted to attacking the dead and forcing the deceased to sleep in a solid steel box
The defendant claimed to have assaulted the deceased by anger because the deceased wanted to break up the relationship with the defendant and return to the deceased husband. It cannot be considered that the defendant was seriously persecuted by the deceased for unfair reasons. Therefore not an act of anger The defendant claimed to have thrown the victim into a shelf, causing the dumbbells placed on the shelf to fall at the deceased, it is unlikely to have a heavy impact to death. Together with the medical examination report that the doctor concluded the cause of death that Bleeding in the right chest cavity from the chest is severely injured. The plea of the defendant was not credible. Circumstances in which the defendant hurriedly took the deceased body to be smuggled, indicating that the defendant knew he had committed a serious offense and wanted to cover up the offense
The witness of the circumstances surrounding the case of both the plaintiff and the plaintiff has sufficient weight to indicate that The defendant used brute force, beat the victim with an iron rod, injure the victim, bleed in the chest cavity and force the victim to lie down and curl up inside a solid metal box. The size is about 40 centimeters wide, 70 centimeters long and 45 centimeters high, and the lid of the box is attached with a key.
The deceased was in a state of lying, curled up, bent at his knees until he could not move or breathe easily. Causing suffering while inside a solid steel box Although the results of the medical examination of the corpse were unable to determine whether the victim was suffocated. This is because the corpse is changed after death for a long time, causing the internal organs to deteriorate. The actions of the defendant would have seen the result that the deceased could be fatal. Considered that the defendant had the intention of killing the deceased. According to the Criminal Code, Section 59, paragraph two, and is the detention of the deceased causing death.
And the defendant forced the deceased to lie down, curled up in a small solid steel box until the deceased died in the box. Can be regarded as killing others by torture or by cruelty
The defendant was guilty of killing others by torture or by cruelty. And the base of detention of others causing death according to the lawsuit
In civil cases When the facts are heard, the defendant is guilty of murder by torture or by cruelty. And the base of detention of the dead, causing death The defendant is liable to pay compensation to the plaintiff, both of whom are the mother and child of the deceased.
Judge that the defendant is guilty under the Criminal Code Section 199,366 / 3, together with Section 83, Section 289 (5), 310 paragraph two. When increasing the punishment and reducing the imprisonment by law Probably sentenced to life in prison Continued from the imprisonment of the defendant in the criminal case number red at Sor. 201/2563, Or. 1140/2563 Ee. 1831/2020 of this court confiscated the central goods and allowed the defendant to pay compensation in the amount of 1,700,000 baht to the first co-plaintiff and it was 1,200,000 baht. To the second joint plaintiff, the fees are folded
Reporters reported that the defendant had previously been sentenced to 11 years and 4 months in prison for rape-firearms, which is extended to the drug case. The court ruled on March 18, 2020, with 10 years and 5 months imprisonment that the Thonburi Criminal Court had previously sentenced.
