The sub-committee of 8 coalition parties insists on disagreeing with the referendum on the separation of 3 southern border provinces. Leaving Thailand, insisting on not worrying, believing under constitutional law Makes it possible to find a solution together. The party is fair, insists on a separatist referendum, does not support
On June 9, 2023, reporters reported that From the case of the national student movement Has issued a statement for the people of “Patani” to be able to vote in a referendum on the separation of 3 southern border provinces leave Thailand to become an independent state legally
The latest that the party has advanced today The first meeting of the 8-party sub-working group to form the government. By raising the issue of “Patani” to discuss, at the meeting, Mr. Ramadan Panjor, as MP for the Kao Klai Party led a press conference with the media on the aforementioned case
He confirmed that he did not agree to separate the three southern border provinces. leave Thailand Because it has to work under the framework of the constitution, but there still needs to be room for debate. And if it’s really arguing Believe that there will be many options. If you are mindful and patient, you will see a good solution.
Mr. Ramadan also emphasized that the key now is to create understanding, listen and talk to all groups of people about the situation in the three southern border provinces, reiterating that he is not worried that it will lead to divisions. because I believe under constitutional law will make a different sound find a solution and how to live together
But what is still worrying is that it is nearing the 20th anniversary of the situation in the 3 southern border provinces. Because even though the statistics of violence are reduced But the controversy remains. And no one dared to bring up these matters. But believe that under a democratic government government will seek a way out of the conflict
As for Mr. Kanvee Suebsaeng, secretary-general of the party, it is true that the party supports the right to freedom of expression. But if it’s a referendum on separating the land will not support Because it’s outside the constitutional framework, ready to reiterate that I’m not worried
