Lawyer reveals Pak Klong Rangsit police station is preparing to use ‘old arrest warrant’ to detain ‘Boy’, insisting that the police have no power raise the verdict
On September 15, according to the Court of Appeal Region 1, the bail was ordered by Mr. Phromsorn Weerathhammajaree, or Fah Ratsornmutelu, 2.Mr. Prit Chivarak, or Penguin, the leader of the people, 3.Mr. Thatchapong. Kae Dam or Boy 4. Mr. Panupong Jadnok or Mike Rayong and 5. Mr. Natchanon Pairote, the leader of the Thammasat Coalition and the Rally, with an insurance price of 1000,000 baht and to be equipped with an electronic tracking device (EM) Come, Thammasat Coalition and Assembly Calling for troops to wait to pick up friends at 13.00 in front of Thanyaburi Prison to monitor the process of officials Because it has been reported that Mr. Prit, Mr. Panupong and Mr. Thangpong will be sequestered.
Read news : ‘Rung’ summons civilians in Thanyaburi after 5 leaders have bail, fearing ‘Penguin-Mike-Boy’ will be sequestered
Later, at 2:41 p.m., Mr. Noraset Na Nongtoom, a lawyer at the Lawyers for Human Rights Center posted a message via Facebook stating that
Breaking news!! After the Court of Appeal Region 1 granted bail to Boy Chatchai (Thachaphong) Kaedum, Pak Klong Rangsit Police Station. He was about to go into custody of Brother Boy to detain him by citing the “old arrest warrant”, which had previously shown an arrest warrant.
Read the arrest warrant, notify the rights, report the allegations. Have been interviewed and prosecuted. I saw that the police had no authority to detain anything. all because the original arrest warrant has expired under the law According to the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 68
Example of the Supreme Court’s judgment no. 3744/2541. reported the allegations to the accused notify the rights of the arrested or accused Including the testimony of the accused as well It’s not just a request to attach the suspect alone. but it must be deemed that the investigator has arrested the accused or the accused has been arrested since that time Although the accused is being held in other cases And the investigating officer in this case just got the accused to be prosecuted later.
Therefore, when it is assumed that the accused has been arrested “The warrant of arrest will be ineffective” can no longer be used as a reference for detention.
