38.6 C
Bangkok
Monday, April 29, 2024

Explaining the drama of a Subdistrict Administrative Organization official taking leave to get married abroad for almost half a month.

Permanent Secretary of the Subdistrict Administrative Organization of Atsamat explains the drama of the Subdistrict Administrative Organization official taking leave to get married abroad for almost half a month. Specified as the correct use of rights.

Date: September 19, 2023 from the Facebook page case “Operation Watchdog” posted a picture of a girl dressed in Thai clothing. Standing with a man wearing a suit With a message claiming that “Take leave to marry your husband for half a month. Just took a long vacation from March 15 to May 11, ’23, totaling almost two months of vacation. Returned to work in a few days. Head of the Permanent Secretary’s Office At Samat Subdistrict Administrative Organization, Roi Et Province, has used its leave rights again. This round is used as business leave from 6-20 June ’23, including holidays for almost half a month. Fly to marry your husband in Australia. After flying back and forth across the country for a year.”

about this Reporters went to the area At Samat Subdistrict Administrative Organization To inquire about what happened with Air Chief Marshal Sarayut Summat, Permanent Secretary of the Subdistrict Administrative Organization, At Samat, knows that this is a true incident. But it is the right of the official. It is done in accordance with the rules and regulations set forth in all respects.

This morning, NACC officials from Roi Et Province Went to the area to request information and received documents. which the said official Have followed the regulations specified in the leave of civil servants who have completed their terms. and receiving proper leave rights

However, he has made a report to the Subdistrict Administrative Organization president, as well as the district and province according to the procedures for granting permission. As for how the NACC will come down and investigate. He did his duty. and confirm that if he has the right He must be entitled If he does not allow Will it be considered a neglect of duty or not?

Source

Latest Articles